<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Skewed News &#187; British Army</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skewednews.com/tag/british-army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skewednews.com</link>
	<description>The News you Want to Read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>British Army chief ready to send 2,000 more troops to Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.skewednews.com/2009/03/27/british-army-chief-ready-to-send-2000-more-troops-to-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skewednews.com/2009/03/27/british-army-chief-ready-to-send-2000-more-troops-to-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Blogs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downing Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skewednews.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing! Take the troops scheduled to fight in Iraq and simply change their travel plans and send them to Afghanistan instead. War for oil and oil pipelines continues under the new U.S. elected regime. Afghanistan is a failed war too. One the western world had an opportunity to win if they didn't prove their greed by invading Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>The head of the Army is ready to  send up to  2,000 extra troops to Afghanistan</strong> amid fears that  the US-led mission will struggle without significant reinforcements.</p>
<p>General Sir Richard Dannatt told The Times yesterday that elements  of 12 Mechanised  Brigade — which had been training for deployment to  Iraq but were later stood down — had been “earmarked for Afghanistan”.</p>
<p>Downing Street is involved in discussions about a surge. An increase  of about 2,000 would take Britain’s troop strength to 10,000. Any decision  would require Cabinet approval.</p>
<p>President Obama will announce today  an extra 17,000 US troops and a big rise in civilian officials as part  of his new strategy in Afghanistan. He will also announce a plan to double  the size of the Afghan National Army, with US units training more  recruits, and increased aid to fight militants in neighbouring Pakistan.</p>
<p>Ministers and defence chiefs are ready for Mr Obama to make a  formal request for more British troops, possibly before Nato’s 60th  anniversary summit in Strasbourg next week. They are also prepared to  make an announcement before such a request arrives.</p>
<p>Mr  Hutton also gave a broad hint in a speech yesterday that Britain was  considering sending more troops. “We remain, as we have been  on many occasions in this past century, grateful to the United  States for the leadership that she has shown time and again since 2001 in  rooting out extremism and terrorism in Afghanistan,” he said. “But  Europe must do more, and it is in our interest to do more.”<br />
</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">A  Ministry of Defence source said any decision would be based on advice from  the military. “If the clear advice . . . is that we need more  people to keep our troops safe, we will make a judgment based on  this.”<br />
<strong></strong></span></p>
<p><a title="The Times" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5983582.ece" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>The Times</strong></span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skewednews.com/2009/03/27/british-army-chief-ready-to-send-2000-more-troops-to-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
